11.27.07

On Strike With the Writer’s Guild of America

Posted in Current Events, Politics, Rants, TV at 11:11 pm

Early this morning, I participated in an event I never would have imagined myself taking part in: I went on strike with a labor union.

Specifically, I was a guest picketer for the Writers Guild of America (WGA), joining my dear friend Sarah Watson, writer on NBC’s forthcoming primetime show, Lipstick Jungle.

For those of you unaware, the WGA is a union which represents TV, film, and radio writers. The WGA is striking against the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), which is an industry trade group consisting of U.S. film production companies and studios (ie. GE/NBC/Universal, Disney, Time Warner, etc). Every three years, these organizations negotiate a basic contract. However, in 2007, negotiations failed, and a strike began on November 2, 2007.

The way I understand it (heavily dumbed down — explaining it is neither my jurisdiction nor purpose), there are two major sticking points to the WGA’s strike:

  1. DVD Residuals
    The writers want 8 cents for every DVD sold, double their current 4 cents. That is 0.4% of the revenue from a $20.00 DVD.
  2. “New Media” Residuals
    Writers currently get no money when their work is viewed through Internet downloads, streaming feeds, IPTV, or phone downloads. They want to receive the 2.5% for these (which is what they’re paid on traditional television).

The funniest thing about this strike is what a social event it seems to be for the writers. Everyone I talked to was in optimistic spirits, and was very friendly to Sarah and myself. After all, being out of work for many months at a time is nothing new to a writer. Among those that I met were

The Writers are not dumb, nor are the studios. As Internet and TV are quickly merging (take, for instance, AppleTV, Verizon FIOS, and even the growing popularity of streaming protocols such as Sopcast), each side must stand their ground and try to gain as much leverage over new media as soon as possible. This is especially true since the lines between TV and Internet are blurring and all forecasts of new media are vastly underestimated.

As a Libertarian, I find the entire situation to be a slap in the face to our country’s economic system, which resembles more and more of a joke every day. While I’ve never been pro-Union, I find it absolutely ridiculous that 6 of the largest corporations in the world can unite and dominate an industry with basically no competition between each other.

Our supposed ‘free market economy’ is dominated by corporate interests which have contributed to the disappearance of the middle class — a middle class that is vitally important to the survival of any democratic government.

I fully support the writers’ power to unionize and convene, but I also fully support the corporations power to fire their employees and do things their own way. That’s business.

What I cannot support is the fact that there are six companies worth a quarter of a trillion dollars all in bed with each other, negotiating blanket deals. These same corporations who control everything you read and hear, who are doing everything in their power to silence those who are trying to restore order to this country.

Although this strike has very little impact on my life and that of my family, I feel that it is indicative of the bigger picture — the pendulum has swung too far, and the time for mass corporate backlash is near.

My question to you writers is this: What next? Let’s say you get everything (or almost everything) you bargain for. You are still pawns in the system, stuck in a traditional business which does not fully understand the future of technology and no longer appreciates the people it serves.

Isn’t it time for something new? Why settle for this, when you can take a risk to do better — to compete with the system by starting your own production organization. After all, if you’re not willing to take this risk, then you’ve already lost.

3 Comments »

  1. lon said,

    11.28.07 at 7:38 am

    An internet television network! Down with the terrestrial television networks! It is the only next logical step. Newspapers are sinking because of the internet, why not the networks? They put out nothing but crap these days anyway.

  2. John Handcock said,

    11.28.07 at 10:19 am

    Everyone is a pawn in the system except the CEOs, so I don’t think it’s a matter of branching out and creating a writer studio. Then the actors would create an actor studio and the producers a producer studio, and television/movies would swirl further down the toilet.

    If the 2.5% you mentioned is what has been the working pay-paradigm for television writers, I cannot understand how that same figure does not directly translate to “new media.” Even if the money in new media is less than that of old media, it’s still the same slice size of simply a smaller pie.

    I think the way that things work now is the way they have to work, but it might take a protracted strike for these uber-wealthy studio executives to realize that Jim Morrison was right: They’ve got the guns, but we’ve got the numbers.

    There’s no profit to be had in running a studio without the creative engine of writers. A new slate of reality programming might be headed our way, but I imagine while some will catch, the majority will pass by in utter failure. Writers might seem like creepy crybabies, but it takes creepy crybabies who’ve been shit on their whole lives and who were forced to develop a keen wit and wild imagination in order to overcome the bleak reality of their shituation in order to develop the bittersweet creativity necessary to create worlds and people and situations that go beyond the limits of your common yokel’s imagination.

    All it takes is five minutes of YouTubing to see just why the deep pockets of major corporations are necessary to create a full season of quality programming. For ever “I like turtles” gem you find, there are literally 10,000 videos of disturbingly low-quality production and creativity. A full season of a major production like a show like Friday Night Lights, 22 episodes at 43 minutes per episode, is something like, if my multiplication is correct, and it’s probably not (I’m a writer), 946 minutes of production. “I like turtles” was 30 seconds.

    So, sadly, the current system of deep-pocketed megacorps is a necessary evil.

    But I agree: more competition is more than necessary.

  3. Sarah said,

    11.28.07 at 1:28 pm

    Even an anti-union libertarian seems to get it. Why can’t the studios?

    Thanks for supporting us on the picket line. When we win our fight, I’ll use my four cents to buy you a piece of bubblegum.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

11.22.07

Looks Like I’m Growing My Hair Out

Posted in Life, The Universe, and Everything at 7:51 am

This is a response to this previous blog post.

Happy Thanksgiving, don’t eat too much today you gluttons.

Today I am thankful for the supportive cast that I have around me, both here in Los Angeles, and my friends and family via the phone, internet, and airports. In some aspects, I’m still a worthless child and need help doing things like getting new towels and deciding what to do with my hair.

If anyone in Los Angeles has a good hairstylist that doesn’t charge a million dollars, send them on. I am going to need help with my mullet.

And we’ll now get back to regular blog postings. I’m getting excited for the Top 15 Albums of 2007! (Top Albums of 2006 is here)

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

11.19.07

Poll: What Should I Do With My Hair?

Posted in Life, The Universe, and Everything at 5:45 pm

There is a poll at the bottom of this post. Please vote!

So I was driving around a few weeks ago when I realized that I’m bored with my hair. I’ve essentially had the same curvy/wavy style for over six years. Sometimes it was longer, and sometimes it was shorter, but basically always the same. I’m the kind of guy who gets comfortable with something, and the next thing you know, it’s the end of 2007 and you can’t find your car keys as often as you used to.

The last time I had a major hair change was 6.5 years ago, my freshman year of college. I buzzed my head, and then let it grow back out. The picture is to the right, click on it for the full-size. Nice socks and sandals too.

My hair currently looks something like the picture to the left, which is a pic with my brother’s friend Steve while I was up in Portland (yes, I’m intoxicated there).

I couldn’t find too many good pics with long hair. I essentially grow a fro and need a ton of pomade or gel to make it manageable. One slightly longer-haired pic below with yet another Steve, this one from Austin. Also intoxicated.

I’ve placed a poll at the bottom of this post. What should I do with my hair?

  1. Buzz it.
    Pros:
    Something different, might look interesting with my facial hair (which is being kept), less hassle, I just want to.
    Cons:
    My nose is huge, only black guys look good with short/no hair, and Mom doesn’t want me to do it (this could also be a pro, since I never liked authority telling me what to do anyway). I’m also starting to thin a bit, so maybe I shouldn’t waste any glory years with no hair because it won’t be here forever.
  2. Keep it
    Pros:
    I can’t really complain about how good life has been these past 6.5 years. Why change?
    Cons:
    *Yawn*
  3. Grow it longer
    Pros:
    See above notes about balding situation. Girls like my hair long.
    Cons:
    It’ll be an afro. Hair around my ears drives me nuts. And there’s plenty of chumps in California with too much hair on their heads and I’d rather not be another one of them. Sorry Jordan!

Obviously, my vote is to buzz it. But I want you to vote and I’ll go with whatever wins by Wednesday night at midnight. Please leave comments, and no, I’m not currently going to dye it or bleach it due to working in the corporate world.

What Should I Do For 'Christopher'?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thanks!

11 Comments »

  1. Gingo said,

    11.19.07 at 6:01 pm

    Gotta grow it out, especially if you are thinning. Trust me, you’ll regret it if you waste these last few precious years with those strapping young follicles. All too soon you’ll have no other option than buzzing it.

  2. lon said,

    11.19.07 at 6:32 pm

    Grow it out and sport the sopranos style, greasy, spaghetti bending, dego wop look. I hope no one in your “family” has my legs broken for that.

  3. Rowler said,

    11.20.07 at 1:56 am

    How can you make fun of our blog. Why are you wasting my time with this crap?

  4. Allison said,

    11.20.07 at 8:00 am

    Girls like something to grab on to ;). Especially if it’s thick and curly. It makes it much more fun :-D. DON’T buzz it! I like the 3rd pic - maybe a bit longer.

  5. Maureen said,

    11.20.07 at 9:22 am

    Grow it longer-if you get annoyed-go back to the “keep it the same” length. The buzz reminds me of swim championships-all the guys w/georgeous hair shaved their heads and it was very disappointing!!!!

  6. Jason said,

    11.20.07 at 10:19 am

    Have you considered a mohawk that can be combed down to look reasonable while slaving in the corporate salt mines that you can spike up for the ladies after hours?

    At the very least, grow it out and live it up.

  7. 2tone Tbag said,

    11.20.07 at 10:50 am

    GROW THAT ISH OUT!!!! how can you get a sweet ass mullet with short hair! you have the power - and if its really that curly when long, you can always go the A.C. Slater/Mullet route!

    as opposed to what lowery said… thanks for wasting my time with this (somebody is gettin billed for this time! haha)

  8. Jordan said,

    11.20.07 at 11:20 am

    My vote is for you to resume wearing socks/sandals.

  9. Felicy said,

    11.21.07 at 2:40 pm

    Do not shave your head its not a good look. I think you should try straightening your hair and spike it.

  10. Minh said,

    11.21.07 at 4:20 pm

    Shave your head and donate your hair to charity. There are lots of unfortunate people out there in need of a merkin.

  11. Mike Roberto’s Blog » Looks Like I’m Growing My Hair Out said,

    11.22.07 at 7:51 am

    [...] This is a response to this previous blog post. [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

11.15.07

Starbucks Investors Enroll in Business 101

Posted in Investing at 9:40 pm

Higher prices means greater profit but less customers. You don’t say!

Starbucks can say goodbye to the casual shopper. Joe Sixpack is in debt up to his eyeballs and can’t afford the mortgage, let alone a $5 latte. I think it’s safe to say he’ll be switching to Folgers in his cup this year.

I haven’t liked SBUX for years. See you in the mid-teens by mid-2008, Folgers is in aisle 5.

2 Comments »

  1. Lon said,

    11.17.07 at 2:22 pm

    Hell with Starbucks and Folgers. HEB Brand all the way baby!

  2. Minh said,

    11.18.07 at 5:34 pm

    I’m all about Trader Joe’s delicious tea selection myself. Mango black in particular, is a standout.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment